The Cost of Progress
June 25th, 2007 by Upom MalikScience has provided us nearly all of our modern conveniences. Better food, clean water, the Internet, vaccines, CD Players, airplanes, and so much more are all products of science that we take for granted each and every day. We generally never stop to think what it took to produce them.
However, scientists have paid dearly in order to further their craft. Galileo was tried by the Catholic church as a heretic; Einstein lost his wife and children in creating the the theory of relativity; and Robert Oppenheimer slaughtered 140,000 people. These burdens were tragic, but the fruits of their labor paved the way for the world we now live in- a world that most of us (hopefully) do not regret.
For some researchers, it is too much to bear. Instead of making the necessary sacrifice, they cheat the system. William T. Summerlin, who claimed to have made skin grafts in mice without immunosupression, was found to have colored in grafts with a marker. Eric Poehlman earned 2.9 million dollars in grant money from data points he fabricated. Former professor Vijay Soman even went as far as to steal his colleague’s research and claim it as his own. All of these men wanted to change the world without following a fundamental law of the universe: there is no gain in a system without a loss somewhere else.
As scientists, we must analyze not only data, but what it takes to perform good science. If this cost is too great for a person, then he or she does not deserve to change the world. We must always keep one thing in mind when we work in the lab: the cost of progress is steep, but so is the price of honor.



